The whole plot of the latest Mission: Impossible film, subtitled Rogue Nation, and directed by Christopher McQuarrie, who also wrote
the screenplay and is involved in one way or another in just about everything
Tom Cruise stars in these days, hinges on the usual MacGuffin device. In this
case it’s a cache of data that will give financial support to an international
crime organization known as The Syndicate. They are essentially the
anti-Impossible Mission force, comprised of agents from all over the world who
disappeared, presumed dead, over the last several years. The thing is, the data
can be accessed using fingerprint and voice ID of only one person – the Prime
Minister of Britain! I mean, there’s security and then there’s just plain
stupid and ineffective. What happens if the PM suddenly dies? What if he
resigns? What if he’s revealed to be greater than Nixon levels of corrupt?
Anyway, this is just a minor logical inconvenience o the way to a
cleverly-crafted sequence that results in the kidnapping of the Prime Minister.
And clever set pieces are the stock in trade of the Mission: Impossible series.
A blog mostly dedicated to cinema (including both new and old film reviews; commentary; and as the URL suggests - movie lists, although it has been lacking in this area to be honest), but on occasion touching on other areas of personal interest to me.
Showing posts with label Tom Cruise. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom Cruise. Show all posts
Saturday, October 3, 2015
Saturday, February 8, 2014
Special 500th Movie Review: Magnolia - a Modern Classic From My Collection
In choosing a movie to watch to mark my 500th
full length review, I went with Paul Thomas Anderson’s Magnolia because, along with Pulp Fiction and The Godfather, it’s
one of my top three movies of all time. By that I mean I consider it not only a
great film, but that I find it endlessly watchable. Incidentally, I chose it several weeks prior to, and started watching the night before, Philip Seymour Hoffman's death. It was merely a thematically fitting coincidence. I have tried to watch it
about once a year since it came out in 1999 and have mostly kept up on that
vow. I think I may have watched it twice during my five years in Spain and
possibly only this time since returning two and a half years ago, but I am
intimately familiar with the movie. I also chose it because so much time has
passed since last we met.
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
25 Years Ago This Month: December 1988
Typical of December, the final month of 1988 was full of releases vying desperately for awards consideration, especially Oscars. Eight films released in this month received Academy Award nominations, including all five of the Best Picture nominees.
As always, we start with what I've seen...
Barry Levinson's Rain Man was the box office behemoth of the year and winner of the Best Picture Oscar the following year. It embodies everything a typical "best picture" is, but mostly it's a rather simplistic portrait of autism produced at a time when virtually no one knew anything about the disorder. A quarter century later, many people can probably tell you something about it, most mistakenly that it's caused by childhood vaccinations. Dustin Hoffman's autistic savant is the very rare exception among people on the spectrum, but in 1988 it led most people to believe that being autistic meant being able to count cards and take the house in a Las Vegas casino.
As always, we start with what I've seen...
Barry Levinson's Rain Man was the box office behemoth of the year and winner of the Best Picture Oscar the following year. It embodies everything a typical "best picture" is, but mostly it's a rather simplistic portrait of autism produced at a time when virtually no one knew anything about the disorder. A quarter century later, many people can probably tell you something about it, most mistakenly that it's caused by childhood vaccinations. Dustin Hoffman's autistic savant is the very rare exception among people on the spectrum, but in 1988 it led most people to believe that being autistic meant being able to count cards and take the house in a Las Vegas casino.
Sunday, October 27, 2013
Short Cut Movie Review: Oblivion
A Short Cut Movie Review is normally less than 400 words, but in some cases may go slightly over. This is my attempt to keep writing about as many films as I see without getting bogged down with trying to find more to say. They are meant to be brief snapshots of my reaction to a movie without too much depth.
Oblivion is a
movie that looks almost perfect in terms of production design and visual
effect. It deftly recalls and references several science fiction classics, but
then fails to live up to the standards set by those that came before.
Tom Cruise is Jack Harper, a technician working to repair
battle drones on earth that are in place to defend some big energy-producing
machines from attack by Scavs, an alien race that lost a war with humans
several decades ago. He explains everything in a narration that precedes the
title. If you miss anything, don’t fret because it is all repeated almost
verbatim later in the film as dialogue between Jack and Beech (Morgan Freeman),
the leader of a band of humans found to still be living on earth.
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
25 Years Ago This Month: July 1988
First there was John McTiernan's Die Hard, a fine action thriller that spawned a string of increasingly ludicrous sequels. It solidified Bruce Willis as an action hero, helping him break out of his "Moonlighting" and romantic comedy typecasting, and it introduced Alan Rickman to American audiences as the suave and cunning villain Hans Gruber.
For the ladies there was Tom Cruise in Cocktail later in the month. Believe it or not, I've never actually seen it. I had no interest in it during its cable run in 1989/1990.
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Short Cut Movie Review From My Collection - Mission: Impossible II
I was so crazy for John Woo at the time Mission: Impossible II came out that
almost nothing could have deterred my enthusiasm for the film. I still love it
today and see plenty to admire in it and it remains my favorite of the four
films in the series, but there are some obvious flaws in it that I never quite
saw 13 years ago.
People have been criticizing this film, as well as many
other Woo films, for the use of slow motion, for the unbelievable drama, for
the doves and pigeons. Okay, his use of birds floating around during climactic
action scenes does get tiresome. But I think the heightened drama really plays
well in most of his films, and especially well in the case of Mission: Impossible II. Woo loves to
combine elements of Douglas Sirk level melodrama with totally unbridled action.
Isn’t an action sequence more thrilling, doesn’t the lump in your throat or the
hold on your breath grow more powerful if the dramatic tension is raised even beyond
the level of realism? Why should we criticize a movie that employs ridiculous and
unbelievable action stunts for coupling it with unbelievable drama?
Until Misson:Impossible – Ghost Protocol, this was easily some of Tom Cruise’s greatest
stunt work as an actor. His love interest, played by Thandie Newton, is exquisitely
beautiful. I never had any problem believing the two of them could fall so hard
for each other so quickly. Dougray Scott isn’t exactly the greatest villain in
action history and he does force it occasionally, but watching it now I’m more
focused on his number two man, played by Richard Roxburgh. Compare Roxburgh’s
performance here with his role in Moulin
Rouge and you see what a fantastic actor he is.
The movie’s weakest link, I see now, is Robert Towne’s
screenplay, which relies too heavily on clichĂ©-ridden often lazy dialogue. It’s
remarkable to think this is the same guy who wrote Chinatown. Also, some of the stunts don’t make physical sense when
a man is flying through the air in one direction and he’s suddenly propelled in
the opposite direction by a bullet. It’s poor in a disorienting way. But
overall, the stunts are spectacular and the vast majority of the action
expertly directed by master Woo.
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Short Cut Movie Review - Mission: Impossible III
A Short Cut Movie Review is normally less than 400 words, but in some cases may go slightly over. This is my attempt to keep writing about as many films as I see without getting bogged down with trying to find more to say. They are meant to be brief snapshots of my reaction to a movie without too much depth.
The writing partners Alex Kurtzman and Robert Orci, along
with director and co-writer J.J. Abrams, tried to give IMF agent Ethan Hunt a
little more personal stake in the spy game by giving him a fiancée (Michelle
Monaghan). To allay any suspense regarding the action movie clichĂ© of the hero’s
lover being in danger, Abrams opens the film with a sadistic scene of the
villain, Owen Davian (Philip Seymour Hoffman) attempting to extract information
from a bound Ethan (Tom Cruise) before killing his fiancée. This allows the
anticipation to build differently, knowing what their fate will be and also
knowing that once he capture Davian early in the film, we will see him get
away. Having flesh in the game isn’t quite enough, apparently, because they
also gave Ethan a female spy protégé (Keri Russell) for whom he feels a need to
exact revenge.
Ving Rhames returns as Luther, the team’s computer
expert, remarking about their mission to break into The Vatican that it’s a
cakewalk compared to Langley, referencing the centerpiece break in of the first
film. Maggie Q and Jonathan Rhys Myers round out the IMF team, with Billy
Crudup serving as Ethan’s boss and Laurence Fishburne adding severity and
gravitas as the IMF director. The action dutifully pumps along. Abrams has
continually proved himself a whiz of an action director and this is where he had
just begun to cut his teeth. It’s generally a fine effort as far as these
things go.
Sunday, December 30, 2012
Jack Reacher Movie Review
It has been so long since I’ve been both truly surprised
and genuinely thrilled at the movies that I’d almost forgotten the feeling, but
Jack Reacher reminded me of exactly
the reason why I love sitting in a darkened cinema several dozen times a year.
It is not the best movie I’ve ever seen. It’s not even the best movie I’ve seen
this year. But it did exactly what I expect an action thriller to do and it did
it competently, excitingly, originally, and without pandering to the lowest
common denominator audience members. I loved this movie. I loved it almost
unequivocally. I loved it for all the reasons it could have been a standard
genre film, but wasn’t. Loved it for all the ways it managed to enthrall me
from one minute to the next. Christopher McQuarrie, who wrote the hugely
popular (though not well-liked by me) The
Usual Suspects, adapted the story from the eponymous character created by
author Lee Child and more specifically from one of the sixteen books featuring
Jack Reacher as the main character.
Friday, May 11, 2012
From My Collection: The Outsiders Movie Review
Francis Ford Coppola’s The Outsiders, based on the novel by S.E. Hinton, is one of those
iconic movies from my childhood. It was slightly before my time, but I watched
it any time I caught it on TV. The boys in the film were old enough that to me
they were grown up. Still, something in the story connected with me in a strong
way so that I lived and breathed with their actions and, in some cases, their
tragic ends. Of course it didn’t hurt that it’s a story about boys being boys
without any real authority to direct their rambunctious energy and it all ends
with an epic rumble in the rain and mud.
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
25 Years Ago This Month: May 1987
Everything that makes tons of money at the box office is ripe for sequel production. Beverly Hills Cop II didn't live up to the promise of the first one, which is a smartly written and well-made action film. The sequel finished at number three for the year with $153 million in domestic box office receipts.
Sunday, January 1, 2012
Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol Movie Review
With the exception the second (because John Woo is an
exceptional action director), I’ve generally been less than impressed by the Mission: Impossible series of films. They
tend to be keyed up James Bond knock-offs employing high-tech non-existent
gadgets, but going a few steps beyond 007 by staging spectacular stunt and
action sequences. What has generally impressed me most is Tom Cruise’s
tremendous physicality and propensity for doing nearly all his own stunts. That
he is willing to dive in head first (sometimes literally) lends the series a
bit of authenticity. It allows the action sequences to be shot at distances
that simultaneously reveal the actor’s face and the sheer danger involved.
Seldom do I notice use of green screen in these films, a fact I attribute to
Cruise’s hands-on control as a producer of the series.
Monday, October 3, 2011
25 Years Ago This Month: October 1986
25 Years Ago I was probably just beginning to learn my multiplication table in Mrs. Hansen's third grade class. I don't remember much else about what I learned that year. I remember studying European geography, learning the countries and possibly their capitals. Yugoslavia was still a unified country and I remember, even at age 8, that my classmates were immature in laughing at the name because it was like, "You go slav." The things that stick in our memories.
I certainly wasn't going to the movies so much, but I've seen a half dozen or so of the films that opened in October of 1986. There's little that's particularly notable. The list of releases contains the usual mix of prestige projects aiming for the awards season and popular fluff (action and comedy, mainly) to keep the investors happy.
Sunday, May 1, 2011
25 Years Ago This Month: May 1986
Anyone remember a movie called Sweet Liberty? It's about a guy who writes a book on the American Revolution, sells the film rights and then the film crew comes to town to make the movie and throws his life into upheaval. It was directed by and stars Alan Alda. Also with Michael Caine and Michelle Pfeiffer. It was also Lillian Gish's second to last movie. I have vague recollections of catching bits of it on cable TV when I was a kid and skipping right past it. Well, it opened 25 years ago this month.
There were several more memorable films opening that month, so it's no surprise that in the lead-up to the summer box office bonanza, Sweet Liberty only pulled $14 million.
After all, Top Gun went on to be the top grossing film of the year, raking in a whopping $177 million (Hey! That was a lot of money back then). This film really needs no introduction, right? Tom Cruise, Anthony Edwards, Val Kilmer and Rick Rossovich playing beach volleyball shirtless? Ring a bell? Cruise and Kelly McGillis enjoying passion with soft blue backlighting to the tune of Berlin's "Take My Breath Away."
Friday, April 22, 2011
25 Years Ago This Month: April 1986
It turns out April 1986 was a rather uneventful month at the cinema in the United States. The two biggest box office money earners were basically flops. First was Ridley Scott's Legend starring a pre-Top Gun Tom Cruise.
The second was the low-budget creature feature Critters starring Dee Wallace and a teenage Scott Grimes.
If we ignore a forgotten film from 1974 and a nearly forgotten horror flick called The Hand, Oliver Stone's first important directorial feature was released this month. Salvador stars James Woods as a journalist who travels to El Salvador to document the 1980 civil war and becomes entangled with both the guerrillas and the right-wing military.
The second was the low-budget creature feature Critters starring Dee Wallace and a teenage Scott Grimes.
If we ignore a forgotten film from 1974 and a nearly forgotten horror flick called The Hand, Oliver Stone's first important directorial feature was released this month. Salvador stars James Woods as a journalist who travels to El Salvador to document the 1980 civil war and becomes entangled with both the guerrillas and the right-wing military.
Sunday, March 27, 2011
The Last Samurai Movie Review
This review was first written and published in December 2003 on a website that no longer exists. The unusual structure is a remnant of that site's requirements.
Synopsis: Captain Nathan Algren (Tom Cruise) is a war hero who served under General Custer. He is offered the opportunity to travel to Japan to train the Imperial Army so they may successfully put down a rebellion of samurai warriors. The US Government stands to get a lucrative weapons contract out of the deal. When the ill-prepared Japanese soldiers are hastily sent into battle, the samurai handily defeat them, taking Algren as their prisoner after demonstrating his fearsome fighting capabilities while fending off five or six samurai. He spends the winter months in a small village in the mountains learning the ways of Japanese culture and training as a samurai. In the spring he returns to Tokyo and his own commanding officer to find that his loyalties lie with the villagers with whom he has developed a strong bond. Algren chooses to side with his principles and to fight with the samurai against the invasion of the US-backed Japanese military.
Scoop: A film like The Last Samurai risks criticism for making a white man the emotional center of a story about Japanese warriors. If this were a story about a white man who leads the helpless samurai, through the use of his Western knowledge, to a tremendous victory against the invaders, then such criticism might be valid. But director Edward Zwick and screenwriter John Logan have made a film about an American soldier who has lost himself at home and is saved by a culture he finds to be right, pure and honorable.
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Knight and Day Movie Review
Knight and Day is absolutely the kind of cheap (and I’m not referring to the budget) mindless entertainment I should hate, but there was something about this Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz star vehicle that was really quite enjoyable.
The film is directed by James Mangold from a script by Patrick O’Neil. Mangold is establishing himself as a good action director whose indie roots with films like Heavy and Cop Land taught him not to lose sight of character development. His 2007 remake of 3:10 to Yuma is probably his best film, but I still think he has a substantial, if not great, film in him yet. He’s got a great feel for action pacing. Clocking in at 105 minutes, Knight and Day is a breath of fresh air from the bloated excess of the 2 hour plus action films that normally come from the big studios.
The film is directed by James Mangold from a script by Patrick O’Neil. Mangold is establishing himself as a good action director whose indie roots with films like Heavy and Cop Land taught him not to lose sight of character development. His 2007 remake of 3:10 to Yuma is probably his best film, but I still think he has a substantial, if not great, film in him yet. He’s got a great feel for action pacing. Clocking in at 105 minutes, Knight and Day is a breath of fresh air from the bloated excess of the 2 hour plus action films that normally come from the big studios.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Everything I Saw in the 2nd Half of 2025
30 Dec. Hamnet (2025) [cinema]* 28 Dec. #4133 Song Sung Blue (2025) [cinema] 25 Dec. #4132 Marty Supreme (2025) [cinema] 16 Dec. #4131...
-
When I was in my twelfth grade English class I was fixated on symbolism, loss of innocence metaphors and literature that you could tuck in ...
-
This film will open commercially in the United States on 22 April 2011. Immediately after being born, an infant child is tattooed ...
-
As a staunch non-believer I’ve only ever encountered two films that gave me a sense of what religious fulfillment is. Not that I was spir...
















