An Allegory

Imagine there exists a company that runs athletic centers all around the world. It's a massive company with influence on fitness throughout the United States and Europe as well as many other countries. Each center runs special fitness programs for children. It's inexpensive, even free in most places, surviving largely on donations. It's a great way for children to feel a part of something, give them something to do after school and on the weekends that is good for their bodies and their emotional development. It gives them the chance to interact in a positive way with other children from different neighborhoods.

A news story breaks that at your local chapter of this athletic company the man running the children's program has been accused by several people of sexually abuse. As the news spreads around the country, other victims start to come forward stating that they too were abused in the children's program at their local chapter. Middle-aged adults begin coming forward stating that it happened to them many years in the past. You see where I'm going with this, right?

Additional news stories break in European countries of the same kind of thing involving the same company. Further investigation reveals that in many cases, the immediate supervisor of the head of the children's program was made aware of the sexual abuse. In most of those cases, the supervisor reported it to the general manager, who passed it on to the area director and it's possible (probable even) that news traveled all the way to the CEO and Board of Directors. In each case, from the top down, the decision was made 1)not to fire the employees engaging in child sexual rape and abuse, 2)not report the crime to the authorities and 3)to keep the scandal under wraps for fear that the bad press would ruin the organization.

In other words, the top management in the company made a decision that the PR of the company was more important than protecting the children. What do you think would be the public reaction to such a story? How would people treat this company? Would people continue to 1)send their children to these programs and 2)go to the centers themselves? Would people continue to donate money to this organization? Would criminal charges be brought against these top managers for failing to report the crime of child sexual abuse and for being complicit in the abuse itself?

Obviously I've created a bit of a thought experiment to parallel the rampant, systemic sex abuse that's been going on (quite possibly for many centuries) in the Catholic Church.

While there is some evidence that church attendance will decline, especially among young Catholics, and that donations will slow, it seems very unlikely that the Church will take a major hit from this. Let's not even discuss the possibility that high-ranking bishops, cardinals or The Holy Father Himself, Pope Nazi I, will ever be charged as criminals.

Incredibly, many people around the world will continue to play an active role in supporting the Church. But the real problem is the vast majority who will play a passive role in support of the Catholic Church. These are the people who aren't strongly involved in the Church, who don't go to weekly mass and who rarely, if ever, donate. These are the people who propagate the Church by baptizing their children, forcing their children through the rigors of Holy Communion and Confirmation, who decide, in spite of these heinous crimes, to get married in the Church.

In fairness the athletic center analogy is not perfect for one crucial reason. I freely admit that I don't know what it feels like to have a personal connection to the Church, or any church for that matter. I can't speak to the deep convictions a devout Catholic has toward the faith. Surely this creates a very different relationship to the Catholic Church as an organization than people would have toward an athletic center. It's this deeply felt connection that makes it so difficult for people to renounce the organization, despite the revelation that it's one which has allowed child sexual abuse to thrive for decades (or more).

Andrew Sullivan has a compelling thesis for why sex abuse scandals among religious organizations seem unique to the Catholic Church and why the celibacy law must be eliminated.

New Arizona Immigration Law a Disgrace to the Constitution

This has been expected for some time now, but Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona has just signed into law an immigration bill that, among other things, will make it a legal requirement for all immigrants to carry their documentation and give law enforcement broad power to enforce it.

The crux of the bill relates to employment, trafficking and transportation of illegal immigrants. But the provision (the first section of the bill) that has a lot of people in a tizzy (including President Obama) is the new power bestowed upon the police.

Not to worry, however. Governor Brewer is aware of the potential for abuse of power:

She said that racial profiling would not be tolerated, adding, “We have to trust our law enforcement.”

She completely misses the point of how authoritarianism is born. The idea of a free society is that the people have inalienable rights that are neither granted them nor controlled by the government. These rights belong to the people. We trust law enforcement because we the people have the power. When you give too much power to the police, the door to distrust is thrust open and somewhere the power will be abused.

Here's another bit that caught my attention:

It requires police officers “when practicable” to detain people they reasonably suspect are in the country without authorization and to verify their status with federal officials, unless doing so would hinder an investigation or emergency medical treatment.

This is giving way too much wiggle room to law enforcement, it seems to me. What is a reasonable suspicion that someone is in the country illegally? How many legal and documented immigrants (not to mention both naturalized AND natural born citizens) do you think will be asked for "zeir papuhz pleaz"? I'm no friend to the Catholic Church at the moment, so you know something's amiss when I'm in perfect agreement with the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.

I know what people like my Dad would say: "If you're not doing anything wrong you've got nothing to hide." A very easy thing for a white man to say when he'll never have to put up with the kind of police harassment that is sure to be reported when this law takes effect later this year. What happens to citizens who aren't required to carry ID, yet "look like" immigrants? Will those people, unable to cough up a birth certificate or US passport on demand be detained and held in county jail until such documents can be produced?

Surely it's no accident that this piece of legislation was signed into law on Trash Day, a day when unpopular news gets dumped so fewer people will pay attention.

I'm not hyperventilating about this law. I have full confidence that it will be swiftly challenged and struck down in court. But I do think it's worth paying attention to and recognizing that the kind of thinking that completely misunderstands the Constitution and would seek to undermine it for personal gain continues to pervade. Don't travel to Arizona as long as this law is on the books. Don't give them the satisfaction of your tourist dollars.