Although The Fisher
King is definitely much more of a Terry Gilliam film than a Robin Williams
show, I’d never seen it before and so took the unfortunate occasion of Williams’
death to watch and review it. I say it’s a Gilliam film, but thtat’s based
almost entirely on the visual style. The story elements contain themes that
continually come up in Gilliam’s films such as the age-old conflict between
good and evil. But in the character of Parry, a homeless ex-college professor
suffering traumatic delusions owing to the witnessing of the brutal murder of
his wife, it also becomes, in retrospect, a great Robin Williams vehicle.
A blog mostly dedicated to cinema (including both new and old film reviews; commentary; and as the URL suggests - movie lists, although it has been lacking in this area to be honest), but on occasion touching on other areas of personal interest to me.
Showing posts with label Amanda Plummer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amanda Plummer. Show all posts
Sunday, August 17, 2014
Friday, December 20, 2013
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire Movie Review
The Hunger Games:
Catching Fire does just about everything a studio wants from its sequels.
It basically repeats the successful formula of The Hunger Games, but adds a new bevy of recognizable Hollywood
faces. The one thing it mercifully resists is ramping up the action. The Hunger Games was an exercise in Gary
Ross’s control and his successor Francis Lawrence follows in his footsteps,
keeping the majority of the action within the centerpiece installment of the “games”
themselves even while the stakes have been greatly increased.
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
"Jules, You Give that Fuckin' Nimrod $1500, I'll Shoot Him on General Principle.": Pulp Fiction Analysis Part XXIV and Conclusion
Go to Part XXIII: "I had what alcoholics refer to as a 'moment of clarity.'
![]() |
| The Tarantino "Mexican Standoff" |
Vincent gets up to go to the bathroom (remember he was visible over Honey-Bunny’s shoulder in the prologue) and a few seconds later the robbery starts. This time, Honey-Bunny’s line is “Any of you fuckin’ pricks move and I’ll execute every one of you motherfuckers.” It is slightly different from the “I’ll execute every motherfucking last one of you” she said the first time. This is another bit in the film often cited as a continuity error. Again, it doesn’t make sense that this is a mistake. Why would Tarantino have recorded the line of dialogue twice with different words each time? He also shoots the second half of the line from a different angle than in the prologue. This is another example of Tarantino having a little fun with his audience and suggesting that different perspectives and perceptions of the same event will produce different versions of the truth.
![]() |
| Honey Bunny is shot from a side angle as opposed to the front angle of the first scene in the film, suggesting the dialogue line change is related to differing perspectives. |
Thursday, February 3, 2011
"Everybody Be Cool This Is a Robbery": Pulp Fiction Analysis Part I
Go to introduction.
First we see a title card with two dictionary definitions of “pulp:” 1 – A soft, moist, shapeless mass of matter; 2 – the one we are concerned with – A magazine or book containing lurid subject matter and being characteristically printed on rough, unfinished paper. The film recalls old pulp novels and magazines of the 30s and 40s – stories that were cheap, easy reads with memorable characters[1]. You could read them quickly and then throw the book away, keep it in your back pocket to enjoy on your lunch break, etc. That is essentially what the movie Pulp Fiction is. Although it has since become iconic in the world of independent cinema, we should bear in mind that ultimately the story has no great aspirations. Tarantino did not seem to strive for anything epic or important, but rather to tell a good story with spicy dialogue and an ultra-cool sensibility.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Modern Classic Movie Review: Pulp Fiction
As a special treat to celebrate my 100th movie review posted to this site (I've actually written more than 100, but they haven't all been posted here) I decided to write a full length review of the film that got me interested in film in the first place.
Additionally, over the next few weeks I will post, in pieces, the full analysis I did on the film several years ago. Keep your eyes open for that starting this week.
It’s amazing to me that after roughly twenty viewings from beginning to end plus an exhaustive shot-by-shot study of it, there are still moments in Quentin Tarantino’s Pulp Fiction that make me smile, chuckle or even downright surprise me: The Wolf’s smile of appreciation for the delicious coffee served up by Jimmy; Mia Wallace’s tomato joke to break the tension after an intense scene. Incredibly, watching it again for this review, I even pulled out something new that I had never picked up on before. And it wasn’t even a minor detail, but one that ties into one of the major themes of the film.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Everything I Saw in the 2nd Half of 2025
30 Dec. Hamnet (2025) [cinema]* 28 Dec. #4133 Song Sung Blue (2025) [cinema] 25 Dec. #4132 Marty Supreme (2025) [cinema] 16 Dec. #4131...
-
When I was in my twelfth grade English class I was fixated on symbolism, loss of innocence metaphors and literature that you could tuck in ...
-
This film will open commercially in the United States on 22 April 2011. Immediately after being born, an infant child is tattooed ...
-
As a staunch non-believer I’ve only ever encountered two films that gave me a sense of what religious fulfillment is. Not that I was spir...





