The classics of Russian literature don’t tend to have
definitive film versions, though it may be that Tom Stoppard’s adaptation of
Leo Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina changes
that – for a while anyway. There was a Hollywood version in 1948 starring
Vivien Leigh, but it has not stood as an important work of cinematic
adaptation. Generally speaking, the literary adaptations from Hollywood in the
Golden Age offered little in making the works cinematic. They were so often
(and still are, for that matter) like filmed stage plays with sumptuous sets
and intricately patterned costumes and British actors donning an air of
pomposity. These films feel stifled by a desire to be ‘true’ to the material,
making for very boring viewing experiences. To read Anna Karenina should not be the same experience as it is to view
it.
A blog mostly dedicated to cinema (including both new and old film reviews; commentary; and as the URL suggests - movie lists, although it has been lacking in this area to be honest), but on occasion touching on other areas of personal interest to me.
Showing posts with label Matthew MacFadyen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matthew MacFadyen. Show all posts
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Everything I Saw in the 2nd Half of 2025
30 Dec. Hamnet (2025) [cinema]* 28 Dec. #4133 Song Sung Blue (2025) [cinema] 25 Dec. #4132 Marty Supreme (2025) [cinema] 16 Dec. #4131...
-
This film will open commercially in the United States on 22 April 2011. Immediately after being born, an infant child is tattooed ...
-
Back in 1996 I was truly taken in by Barry Levinson’s Sleepers , adapted from Lorenzo Carcaterra’s allegedly autobiographical novel relat...
-
The financial crisis that started in 2008 is far too complicated to explain in one 2 hour dramatic film. The experts on the subject can h...
