I’m coming at my review of Zero Dark Thirty after it has become a lightning rod for criticism
and charges that it depicts torture as having elicited a positive outcome in
the hunt for Osama bin Laden, overplaying the role of “Enhanced Interrogation
Techniques” in tracking down the world’s most wanted terrorist. Director
Kathryn Bigelow’s defense is as reasonable and accurate as you can get:
depiction is not the same as support. But the specific charge is that the
story, as laid out in Mark Boal’s screenplay, has the chain of information
leading to bin Laden coming from facts gleaned through torture. I recognize
this is problematic, made more complicated by the fact that Boal and Bigelow
have touted the journalistic nature of the film.
Bigelow could not leave torture out of the story, she
claims, because it was part of the story as it happened in real life, whether
that torture was effective or not. But they begin their film by announcing that
everything in the film comes from firsthand accounts of real events even though
we know that the Senate Intelligence Committee found that torture did not
provide any useful information that ultimately led to bin Laden. So we come
back to the argument that it’s a movie that takes liberties. Then that
journalistic approach to filmmaking gets in the way again and suddenly I’m
dizzy. In all seriousness, though, I have no real problem with Bigelow exploiting
scenes of torture in her film about the hunt for Osama bin Laden. Those scenes
are at times brutally uncomfortable to sit through, especially as you
contemplate that this is what the government of my country authorized. No,
torture may not have led us to bin Laden, but it is part of the story and it
would be disingenuous to ignore its importance in the overall program of
hunting down terrorists.
As to the movie itself, which is difficult enough to
divorce from politics, Zero Dark Thirty
is one of the most gripping political thrillers in the last several years. I
kept thinking of Argo for the obvious
connections to the Arab world in the two stories, but also to slow burn
thrillers like Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
that rely more on building suspense in disquieting moments than on thumping
action. Although Zero Dark Thirty is
certainly more amped up than Tinker Tailor
Boal’s screenplay is structured to hit all the major
developments that took place during the nine year investigation and hunt for
bin Laden. It seems clear that it’s all painstakingly researched and I have no
doubts about the veracity of the claim that it’s all based on firsthand
accounts. It spends a lot of time sifting through the intelligence meetings and
briefings. This isn’t the kind of thriller where an agent picks up key
information and dashes off to save the day. This is more about the long slog of
putting in tireless hours of interviewing key witnesses and associates,
listening to tips, paying off snitches. This all raises an interesting point
with regard to the torture issue. Opponents of torture often argue that even if
it weren’t inhumane, it’s anyway not nearly as effective as having “people on
the ground” gathering intelligence. One of the most important breaks in the
case in Zero Dark Thirty happens as a
result of paying off a snitch with a $250K Lamborghini. That seems to me a
pretty good argument against torture
as a method for extracting intelligence.
What I found the film does incredibly well, apart from
building tension around a story whose outcome we already know, is demonstrate
the sheer enormity of the task involved in tracking down a man who doesn’t want
to be found and is exacting about choosing his associates, all of whom are
equally interested in keeping him safe. When thousands of tips are coming in
daily from countries all over the world, how can a single agency be expected to
keep up? So it’s hardly a surprise when another crucial piece of evidence comes
in years too late because it just got buried in the noise. There simply wasn’t
manpower enough to track down every single lead. So in effect Zero Dark Thirty is about the necessity
of having the requisite instinct, without which we never would have found bin
Laden, for tracking down the right leads.
The film spends the first 45 minutes or so with the film’s
star, Jessica Chastain as Maya, mostly sidelined by Jason Clarke’s operative
Dan, the enforcer trying to extract information from a detainee at a CIA
blacksite. Through the first act, Maya remains mostly quiet and observant. She
recoils from the more sickening acts committed against the detainee, but alone
in the room with him she doesn’t hesitate for a moment to tell him that he can
end it. This is not your typical female protagonist. Her displeasure at torture
doesn’t come from her femininity but from her humanity. Later she will almost
single-handedly take on the entire intelligence community in her insistence
that the leads she’s uncovered be followed because she truly believes she’s
located bin Laden’s compound.
In that respect, Zero
Dark Thirty is a totally conventional Hollywood thriller, featuring the lone
wolf who takes on the establishment. Scenes staged and executed with great
power are nonetheless ripped from the annals of cinema history: Maya stands up
to her boss in Pakistan (Kyle Chandler) and tells him if he won’t provide the
resources she needs, he’ll have to explain why he didn’t aid in the world’s
largest manhunt; and then several scenes of Maya loudly voicing her opinion in
round table meetings where she’s meant to keep quiet. Maya is professional, she’s
determined, and she’s focused. Later after a friend of hers (Jennifer Ehle) is killed in the
terrorist attack on a CIA compound in Afghanistan, it seems to become a
personal mission for her. When briefing the team that will storm the compound
and take out bin Laden she tells the team leader (Joel Edgerton), “You’re going to kill bin Laden for
me.” This is real Hollywood boilerplate, but something about it just works so
well. Maybe it’s that Maya is a woman unlike most female protagonists who have
preceded her. Maybe it’s that Chastain is such a charismatic performer and
capable of making Maya entirely believable.
Bigelow and Boal claim that Maya is based on a real
person, but I find it a little to tidy that the real woman was responsible for
everything that her cinematic character accomplishes. It fits the narrative too
perfectly. She may be a real person, but it’s hard to believe all of her
actions were undertaken by the same real person. None of that matters in a
negative way, however, as she is, with her jingoism and personal vendetta approach,
the personification of America’s long national nightmare of a search for the
man responsible for 9/11. And I have to admit to feeling a great sense of
satisfaction at witnessing such a pig of a man being coyly tracked to a place
he believed himself to be untouchable. And I watched with excitement and glee
as the U.S. military methodically swept through his compound and ended it all
by putting a bullet in his face. As a nation we waited and hoped for years. Perhaps
we sometimes despaired that bin Laden would never be found, or that he would
die from his kidney disease and we wouldn’t get that cathartic opportunity to
kill him ourselves. Maya is all those feelings together. And in the end, she
doesn’t pull the trigger herself (that would be the Schwarzenegger brand of
Hollywood convention), but it sure feels like she did.
Zero Dark Thirty
feels like the kind of movie that is made twenty years or thirty years after
the fact. Think about Argo or Thirteen Days, which is about the Cuban
Missile Crisis. Those films take place thirty and forty years prior to their
release. Zero Dark Thirty is more
akin to All the President’s Men,
which was made on roughly the same timeframe with respect to actual events, the
clear benefit of which is eyewitness testimonials that are not clouded by poor
memory and time. In a strange way, Zero
Dark Thirty feels like the final word on this particular chapter of
unfortunate history in America. Not that I think we should take a Hollywood
movie as a substitute for historical documents and academic study, but if
movies are supposed to give us entry into an alternate reality, then this is
the ultimate in escapist fantasy: we get to witness one of the most significant
military actions undertaken by the United States in the last fifty years. And
we get it while we’re still coming down off the initial high we experienced
when the story broke only 18 months earlier.
No comments:
Post a Comment