Was it really necessary for Sony to reboot the Spider-Man series only five years after
the last film and ten years after the first? Is Sam Raimi’s trilogy already
ancient history? Apparently for the Millenials anything older than half a
decade is passé. I don’t mind a new actor in the Peter Parker/Spider-Man role
or a new director at the helm. James Bond has changed hands through six actors
across fifty years. The problem I find is the absurd need to retell the origin
story. The Batman series went through
three actors and two directors with a major stylistic shift halfway through
without getting back into Bruce Wayne’s history. It was Christopher Nolan who
rebooted that franchise by taking a completely new track on the mythology.
Unlike Marc Webb’s The Amazing Spider-Man
which is virtually indistinguishable from the first trilogy.
A blog mostly dedicated to cinema (including both new and old film reviews; commentary; and as the URL suggests - movie lists, although it has been lacking in this area to be honest), but on occasion touching on other areas of personal interest to me.
Showing posts with label Steve Kloves. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steve Kloves. Show all posts
Friday, July 27, 2012
Monday, August 29, 2011
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part II Movie Review
It was fairly obviously a cynical ploy to maximize profits that led Warner Bros. executives to split Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows into two films. One film made from the seventh book in the popular series by J.K. Rowling would have had to top the four hour mark to have even a semblance of coherence, but that hasn’t really stopped the writers and directors of the previous films. Last year we were treated to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part I and now this summer the final chapter concluded with Part II.
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Movie Review: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
The real problem facing Steve Kloves (screenwriter of all but the fifth Harry Potter film) since, oh, about the fourth film is that the books are so bloated and weighed down by countless minor characters, back stories and pieces of the puzzle that it’s simply impossible to turn them into entirely coherent movies. I think he’s done a fantastic job with the thankless task he’s taken on. The first three films in the series, although still leaving out some key elements that help explain certain motivations, are effective adaptations of the source material. The third film is still the best, due in large part to director Alfonso Cuarón.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Everything I Saw in the 2nd Half of 2025
30 Dec. Hamnet (2025) [cinema]* 28 Dec. #4133 Song Sung Blue (2025) [cinema] 25 Dec. #4132 Marty Supreme (2025) [cinema] 16 Dec. #4131...
-
This film will open commercially in the United States on 22 April 2011. Immediately after being born, an infant child is tattooed ...
-
The financial crisis that started in 2008 is far too complicated to explain in one 2 hour dramatic film. The experts on the subject can h...
-
Wes Anderson’s filmmaking style has evolved over the years to such extremes of whimsical fantasy that to revisit his second feature, 1998...


