I’m revisiting the original trilogy of Bourne Movies
after seeing Jason
Bourne. I guess that’s backwards, but the inspiration didn’t strike
until I found myself disappointed in the new movie. Seeing how frenetic the
editing was, I felt that Paul Greengrass had taken his style to an extreme. I
didn’t recall that the two he directed were similarly edited.
I certainly remembered that The Bourne Identity, the first film in the series based on Robert
Ludlum’s novels, was stylistically more conservative. It was directed by Doug
Liman, who had cut his teeth on the comedy Swingers
in 1996. Then in 1999 his Pulp
Fiction for kids Go served as
the transition film to Hollywood action. He directs with a certain style of
cool, his characters always laid back and in control even in the most severed
of situations. Think about the repartee between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie as
married assassins trying to kill one another in Mr. and Mrs. Smith. Sure, The
Bourne Identity doesn’t have the same playfulness in its tone, but it is
slick and you can sense that the actors are settled. They have confidence and
they behave like their actions are second nature. And that’s not true only of
Matt Damon as the title character. He may be the principal player whose
character operates purely on instinct, having had rigorous training regimen to
prepare him to become a ghostlike CIA assassin, but everyone else from Chris
Cooper as Conklin, the head of the CIA program known as Treadstone that made
Bourne, to Julia Stiles as Nicky, the logistical support for the program in
Paris always know their next move. They behave like well-trained professionals
and not like trained actors pretending to be well-trained professionals.
What I love about The
Bourne Identity is its premise of a man trying to discover who he is. His
retrograde amnesia has caused him to forget his biographical details, but his
survival skills, facility with multiple languages, and combat training are all
still intact. Imagine waking up one day to discover that you are, in fact, a
trained killer who has committed assassinations. Jason Bourne, as he knows
himself now, wants no part of such a life, but he’s being chased and doesn’t
know why. He takes a young woman he meets in Zurich along with him and
inadvertently gets her in the crosshairs, and then gets her former companion
and his children in danger when they take refuge in his house in the French
countryside.
When an assassin (Clive Owen) comes for him there, it
sets up the film’s best sequence as Bourne outwits his assailant. First he’s
tipped off by the missing dog, then everything from blowing up the gas tank as
a diversion to his use of a flock of birds to determine where the assassin is
hiding is just brilliantly conceived. It’s a great example of an action scene
that relies much less on action than on building suspense and advancing the
narrative. So much of the action in The Bourne
Identity is low key, small scale, and all practical. The use of CGI is
almost non-existent. The big car chase takes place in Paris and involves
old-fashioned stunt driving, great camera work and even better editing. It’s so
much better than what Greengrass put together for the finale of Jason Bourne.
Matt Damon is one of those actors with both movie star charisma
as well as fierce talent. He went at this part full throttle such as to fit
with the taut intensity that Liman imbues the whole film with. All the acting
is very good. It’s better than just the serviceable performance style that we
often get in action movies. Cooper, Stiles, and Brian Cox as CIA Director
Abbott all bring something different to the story. If the film has one weak
link, it’s in the character of Marie, though not in Franka Potente’s
performance, whose motivation for sticking with Bourne after she has driven him
to Paris and got her money is suspect. I also think that Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje’s
performance as Wombosi the Nigerian despot in exile is exaggerated to the point
of being a wee bit offensive.
One of the beautiful differences between this and Jason Bourne is the smaller
stripped-down scale. The CIA analysts work out of what might best be described
as a shabby basement office. There are desktop computers, scattered papers, and
a whiteboard. It looks like a place where people spend all day shuffling papers
and analyzing data. As the films have progressed, these settings have become
more tech heavy, owing in large part I’m sure to increased film budgets. But I
prefer the team of about four people scrambling on computers and trying to use
their wits to track the elusive Bourne.
The Bourne Identity,
more than any other in the series, feels more real, more like the way a spy
agency would have to operate. They are not all-knowing. They rely on judgment
and occasional bad info just like anyone. All of which makes for a far more interesting
narrative in which the stakes are higher for Bourne as well as his adversaries.
No comments:
Post a Comment