Remember when the great advance in film technology was
having animated characters interact with human actors? From the simplistic
designs of Mary Poppins to the
sophisticated effects of Who Framed Roger
Rabbit the union of live action and animation was a marvel used sparingly.
Today we have Oz the Great and Powerful
which is a demonstration of what happens when that technology runs amok.
Sitting through the slow and dull slog of this Wizard of Oz prequel is an exercise in
tremendous patience and the ability of the mind to leap beyond the constant
thought that you’re watching James Franco and Mila Kunis interact with a fully
computer animated world populated by cartoon characters. If you thought the Star Wars prequel trilogy looked like a
bunch of fine actors struggling to perform alongside CGI marks, you ain’t seen
nothin’ yet. The existence of a poorly animated flying monkey (voiced by Zach
Braff) as the comic relief alongside Franco’s titular non-wizard is an insult
to the costuming, makeup, and real sense of danger that gave The Wizard of Oz such dynamism. Let
Disney get their hands on a classic, though, and they’ll turn it into goofy
pap. Does anyone doubt that Judy Garland’s sojourn along the Yellow Brick Road
is all ages viewing? And that’s with a minimal amount of ridiculous comic
relief.
Like The Wizard of
Oz, the film begins in Kansas, filmed in plain Jane black-and-white in the
4:3 Academy aspect ratio until a twister whisks Oz (actually named Oscar) off
in familiar fashion to the land of Oz as the screen widens and becomes full of resplendent
color. Truth be told, the visuals are sumptuous and alluring in a way you would
expect to be pleasing to a small child. Of course it’s hard not to recognize
that it all seems designed to be a visual treat for the Pre-K crowd. But it all
looks so cartoony and absurd. And director Sam Raimi, in his quest to outdo his
own Spider Man trilogy, forgot to
bring any humanity to the characters, a fault also attributable to
screenwriters Mitchell Kapner and David Lindsay-Abaire. It’s a poor showing
when the most human character in the film is an actual China doll (wonderfully voiced by Joey King) who was
shattered and then repaired after losing her entire family. She’s not nearly as
hollow as the rest of her cohorts, Oz included.
Typically in stories like this it’s the villains that
generate the biggest interest, the best characterizations, and the best
performances, but not even the icy beauty of Rachel Weisz or the warm nurture
of Kunis as the wicked witch sisters bring much to the table either in terms of
motivation or empathy. Michelle Williams sleepwalks through a thankless role as
Glinda, the Good Witch, originated with maternal sweetness by Billie Burke in
1939. Franco just wanders aimlessly looking lost amid a sea of dazzling
brightness and special effects. It’s becoming decreasingly interesting to me to
watch actors pretending to have genuine reactions to the green screens that I know
they’re playing to. This is a movie during which I was constantly aware of
sound stages and manipulation, which speaks to the film’s inability to pull me
into the narrative.
Oz the Great and
Powerful even fails as a prequel in its delivery of story material that we
never had any curiosity about to begin with. Did anyone, after watching Judy
Garland traverse the Land of Oz to defeat the wicked witch and win precious
gifts for her friends from the Wizard himself, ask themselves, “How did the
Wizard get there and how did that witch get to be so wicked?” Of course not!
You know why? Because Dorothy’s journey of self-discovery was in her head as
she lay unconscious in her bed. The
Wizard of Oz gave us “it was all a dream” before it became a worn out
narrative crutch used by writers who’d run out of ideas. Oz the Great and Powerful tells us how some dream characters in a
work of fiction from 75 years ago got there. Talk about the very definition of
low impact.
No comments:
Post a Comment