I was so crazy for John Woo at the time Mission: Impossible II came out that
almost nothing could have deterred my enthusiasm for the film. I still love it
today and see plenty to admire in it and it remains my favorite of the four
films in the series, but there are some obvious flaws in it that I never quite
saw 13 years ago.
People have been criticizing this film, as well as many
other Woo films, for the use of slow motion, for the unbelievable drama, for
the doves and pigeons. Okay, his use of birds floating around during climactic
action scenes does get tiresome. But I think the heightened drama really plays
well in most of his films, and especially well in the case of Mission: Impossible II. Woo loves to
combine elements of Douglas Sirk level melodrama with totally unbridled action.
Isn’t an action sequence more thrilling, doesn’t the lump in your throat or the
hold on your breath grow more powerful if the dramatic tension is raised even beyond
the level of realism? Why should we criticize a movie that employs ridiculous and
unbelievable action stunts for coupling it with unbelievable drama?
Until Misson:Impossible – Ghost Protocol, this was easily some of Tom Cruise’s greatest
stunt work as an actor. His love interest, played by Thandie Newton, is exquisitely
beautiful. I never had any problem believing the two of them could fall so hard
for each other so quickly. Dougray Scott isn’t exactly the greatest villain in
action history and he does force it occasionally, but watching it now I’m more
focused on his number two man, played by Richard Roxburgh. Compare Roxburgh’s
performance here with his role in Moulin
Rouge and you see what a fantastic actor he is.
The movie’s weakest link, I see now, is Robert Towne’s
screenplay, which relies too heavily on cliché-ridden often lazy dialogue. It’s
remarkable to think this is the same guy who wrote Chinatown. Also, some of the stunts don’t make physical sense when
a man is flying through the air in one direction and he’s suddenly propelled in
the opposite direction by a bullet. It’s poor in a disorienting way. But
overall, the stunts are spectacular and the vast majority of the action
expertly directed by master Woo.
How about that finale with Tom Cruise kicking up a gun off the ground - while a gun is pointed at him? Sure, that'll work. There's a lot of silly action scenes in this film. MI II is a disappointment.
ReplyDelete