Click here for a list of all other films reviewed and considered for this October 2012 series of horror reviews.
Seven is the
one film as I reached toward adulthood that really got under my skin in a way
that terrified me. This police procedural thriller about a sadistic serial
killer was created through the use of set design and cinematography that are
just unnerving. I can’t recall another film of its kind that left me so shaken.
It’s unrelenting not only in its sick and ghastly murders, of which we only
ever see the aftermath, but also in its dark and depressing tone, designed
specifically to destroy the audience’s will to go on, the way the rain
continually pours down on the movie’s unnamed city and casts a gloom outside
every window. Even the ending, which ties everything together and offers some
explanation for the apparent irrationality of the killer, is almost entirely without
hope or a denouement.
David Fincher had already imprinted his signature
directorial style on the successful Alien
franchise. This was his second film and it seemed to solidify him as one of the
next great creative minds in Hollywood. He brings his personal vision of a
world with a dark underbelly to big studio projects. He has maintained an
independent filmmaker’s spirit throughout his career, albeit with a much larger
budget that is customarily afforded a director of artistic vision. He makes
singular films. Can you imagine any of his films (with perhaps one exception)
directed by anyone else?
Seven is a neo-noir
taken to the extreme edges of darkness such that the classic noir director
Fritz Lang probably never dreamed. I wonder what Lang would have thought of Seven. Consider his masterpiece M, an early German sound film that
predates and presages film noir of the 1940s. The visual similarities are
striking and I would not be at all surprised to learn that Fincher has studied
Lang’s work.
The story is not all that complex either for a film noir
or a detective procedural. It’s fairly basic: a crime is committed; police
begin the investigation; another murder occurs; links are established; serial
killer is hunted; there’s a close call; more murders; killer is caught. The
killer is revealed as a sort of insane genius with a perfect plan. The
detectives are mismatched personalities creating a secondary conflict to that
between police and psychopath. All these things are such standard conventions
of the genre that to read a plot outline should have given any studio executive
pause before committing to a middling formulaic detective plot. Then again,
studio execs love retreading familiar material because they know audiences love
it and continue to lay down money for the same thing repeatedly.
Andrew Kevin Walker’s screenplay takes all those elements
and creates atmosphere by filling in the spaces with details that set the film
apart from its brethren, including an ending that left the studio with serious
misgivings about how it would be received. Walker makes the film less about
procedure than it is about a dank and polluted city awash in decay, where nothing
is as it should be in a morally clean world. This comes through in every scene
from the rain that incessantly falls to the nearby subway that rattles the home
of Detective Mills and his wife Tracy (Gwyneth Paltrow), or the steadily ticking metronome that
Somerset eventually finds doesn’t help him sleep anymore.
Fincher applies the finishing touches along with his
production designer Arthur Max and cinematographer Darius Khondji. Every set
looks rotted and festering, every shot is filled with deep blacks and dark
grays. There is a constant sense of something lurking in the shadows. That
something is the evil infecting the city, an evil embodied by the killer John
Doe (Kevin Spacey, who was not as famous at the time and has a kind of surprise
reveal 90 minutes in), who has studied the works of Chaucer and Milton to craft
his crime of serial murders based on the seven deadly sins.
Morgan Freeman is Detective Somerset, a calm and seasoned
veteran who has seen too much of murder. He is a week from retirement and the
last thing he wants to delve into is a series of grisly murders that he
believes will drag on for months or years. His new partner, Detective Mills, is
played by Brad Pitt in his transition period between pretty boy roles and
serious actor work. Mills is a hothead, spurred on by anger toward the
criminals he tries to ensnare. He takes the crimes almost as a personal affront
to moral order. While Somerset attempt to understand John Doe, Mills writes him
off as a simple psychopath. I do wish the Mills character had been more
complexly written. He’s a little one-dimensional and in retrospect it’s pretty
clear where the story is headed. Walker’s writing of the character and Pitt’s
performance telegraph it early on. Pitt’s performance may be the weakest
element in the film now that I watch it again. His line readings bear the
telltale weakness of an actor trying too hard. I have come to really enjoy Pitt’s
acting in the ensuing years, which have seen him ease back and settle into his
roles to about two steps above somnambulism. It’s a technique that he has
perfected as his own, but in 1995 he wasn’t there yet.
The film’s ability to shock and terrify was its most
important success, especially when I first saw it in the theater. I distinctly
recall two hours of feeling dreadful. You simply never knew what ghastly image
was around the corner. When the SWAT team goes into the sloth victim’s home to
find him a decayed corpse lying in bed, I was disgusted and horrified enough.
When he started coughing with life, I literally fell out of my theater chair. I
can’t recall any other theater experience that has left me so viscerally
affected. I nearly cried from the shock of that moment and never fully
recovered.
Its a real horror movie, had a great experience of a good movie
ReplyDeleteLatest Movie Reviews