I had very little memory of this first sequel. Some of it looked familiar as I watched it for this series, but mostly I don't think I ever really saw it.
Click here for a list of all other films reviewed and considered for this October 2012 series of horror reviews.
These days film sequels are almost obligatory when it
comes to any big budget action, comedy, or horror film. Studios are always
looking to create a franchise cash cow that they can continue milking for
minimal investment and effort. But there was a time when sequels were mostly
limited to horror films. It was a pretty obvious fit. Films produced in the
horror genre were traditionally low budget films written quickly and on the
cheap, using casts of mostly unknown actors (though many of these such as Jamie
Lee Curtis, Kevin Bacon, Johnny Depp, and Jennifer Aniston have gone on to
become stars), shot and produced in an almost guerilla style in a matter of a
few weeks. The popular ones made significant returns on investment, so sequels
were usually inevitable. What’s more, they were (and continue to be) almost
universally excoriated by critics because they tend to be cheap retreads of
what came before. It’s insulting to people like me who spend a great deal of
time watching movies.
I bring all this up as a means of introducing Halloween II, which is a very rare
example of a horror movie sequel that doesn’t just aim to recapture the formula
of its predecessor, but to rework it into a new setting with a genuine attempt
to keep it as scary and suspenseful as the first. John Carpenter and Debra Hill
returned to write the screenplay, but Carpenter refused to direct it, choosing
instead a mostly untested director in Rick Rosenthal. The action is the middle
of the night after Michael Myers’ attacks on the teenagers of Haddonfield.
Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis reprises her original “Scream Queen” role) is
in the hospital and Michael seeks her there. Various hospital staffers get in
his way first, offering up plenty of shocks and carnage before the final
showdown.
Because the events of the sequel take place immediately
following those of the first film, Rosenthal tries to keep it stylistically
very similar. He continues to use a lot of handheld first-person camera point
of view shots to represent Michael’s movements and the film reemploys Carpenter’s
eerie synthesizer score. The hospital setting itself allows for some distinctly
tense and suspenseful setups which manage to hold your attention even while the
deaths themselves are more graphic than in the first film with the amount of
blood depicted more than doubled.
Donald Pleasance returns as Dr. Loomis, who runs around
Haddonfield frantically searching for Michael, loudly insisting that he must be
stopped. As a character there’s not much else for Pleasance to do but run
around acting like a lunatic more in need of treatment than the man murdering
everyone. Then again, none of the characters are here for much other than to be
killed off, which is par for the course in a slasher film. Lance Guest plays a
young ambulance driver who, in taking a liking to Laurie, displays more in the
way of character than most of the rest of the cast combined. Laurie exists
solely to be the female in mortal danger, spending most of her time hopped up
on hospital-administered narcotics to help her sleep. Still she manages to
evade danger.
Of course the sequel can hardly measure up to Halloween given that film’s status as a
genuine near masterpiece of the horror genre. It amps up the body count and the
budget, resulting in a finale of unnecessarily overblown hyperbole, but as a
standalone film it holds up pretty well overall.
No comments:
Post a Comment